The news that a group of Oklahoma senators is considering the defunding of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs at state universities is deeply concerning. The resolution to eliminate DEI from “every vestige” of educational institutions threatens the quality of education in Oklahoma. Here’s why lawmakers should reconsider this move and recognize the importance of DEI programs for student populations.

A Broader Education for All

Contrary to claims that DEI programs are ‘slanted’ against certain values is absurd. DEI programs are designed to create an environment where every student—regardless of their racial, religious, or political background—feels safe and included. Such programs often cover a range of topics, including race, gender, sexuality, and disability, thereby providing students with a holistic understanding of the world around them. This is not indoctrination; it is education in its purest form—designed to broaden minds and foster critical thinking.

Economic Relevance

Businesses across the world are putting more emphasis on DEI. Companies are investing in DEI initiatives because a diverse workforce is not only ethically right but also economically beneficial. Universities with DEI programs are preparing students for this reality, equipping them with the skills needed to navigate an increasingly diverse world. In this sense, DEI programs are as much about employability as they are about social justice.

Mental Health and Well-being

The existence of DEI programs can significantly benefit the mental health of minority students. Colleges can be stressful environments, and this stress is often exacerbated for students who feel like outsiders. DEI initiatives provide necessary support systems and safe spaces for these students, thereby contributing to their well-being and, by extension, their academic success.

Fostering Civic Engagement

Understanding diversity, equity, and inclusion is crucial for functioning effectively in a democratic society. If universities are to prepare students for global citizenship, they must provide an education that enables them to understand and appreciate the diverse world in which they live. Removing DEI programs would mean depriving our future leaders of essential knowledge and skills, impoverishing their civic understanding.

The Risk of Losing Federal Funding

It’s also worth noting that if Oklahoma follows Florida’s lead in banning DEI programs, we risk losing federal funding for our educational institutions. This could have a far-reaching negative impact, affecting not only DEI initiatives but the quality of education more broadly.

The Oklahoma Impact

While critics question the value of DEI programs, evidence shows that they are making a significant positive impact. The University of Oklahoma is a case in point.

For the third consecutive year, INSIGHT Into Diversity magazine has honored the University of Oklahoma with its Higher Education Excellence in Diversity award, a testament to the university’s outstanding commitment to diversity and inclusion. Leading the charge are Jonathan StillBelinda Higgs Hyppolite, Ed.D., and Tyler Figueroa, who have played pivotal roles in achieving this recognition. Additionally, OU was among only 16 institutions nationwide to receive the magazine’s highest honor: Diversity Champion. Such achievements shouldn’t go unnoticed and should serve as a model for what DEI programs can accomplish. #LeadOnOU

If you’re also mentioning Oklahoma City University, you could add another paragraph right after, perhaps like:

Similarly, Oklahoma City University has been making strides in the DEI sphere, thanks to the dedicated work of Talia Carroll, Ph.D., Vice President for Diversity, Equity, & and Inclusion. And now that Oklahoma State University has added Dr. Teara Flagg Lander as their Associate VP of Student Services, we can expect no less. Their efforts are part and parcel of the broader move to create inclusive educational environments throughout the state.


Arguments against DEI programs often stem from misunderstandings or misinterpretations of their goals and outcomes. Rather than viewing these programs as divisive, we should recognize their potential to unite. Let us create more understanding, empathy, and ultimately, social cohesion. Lawmakers must consider the far-reaching implications of defunding DEI programs. Instead, focus on how to improve and expand them for the betterment of our educational system and society at large.

If we want Oklahoma to be a leader in education and workforce development, maintaining funding for DEI programs at our state universities is not just advisable—it’s imperative.